« Apocalypto | Main | How the Media Gets Global Catastrophes Wrong »

February 28, 2007

Real, Reputable Scientists Dissent on Global Warming

"I must state at the outset, that, as a scientist, I can find no substantive basis for the warming scenarios being popularly described. Moreover, according to many studies I have read by economists, agronomists, and hydrologists, there would be little difficulty adapting to such warming if it were to occur." Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"Starting with the nuclear winter and now with the global warming. This scare will also run its course. In 15-20 years, we'll look back and see what a hoax this was." William Gray, Colorado State University meteorology professor emeritus.

"In simple terms, CO2 is the lifeblood of the planet. The vegetation we see around us would disappear if not for atmospheric CO2. This green world largely evolved during a period when the atmospheric CO2 concentration was many times what it is today. Indeed, numerous studies indicate the present biosphere is being invigorated by the human-induced rise of CO2. In and of itself, therefore, the increasing concentration of CO2 does not pose a toxic risk to the planet. In other words, carbon dioxide means life itself. CO2 is not a pollutant." John Christy, Professor of Atmospheric Science and Director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, Alabama's State Climatologist and Lead Author of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Posted by witnit at February 28, 2007 7:03 PM

Comments

Great quotes Wit. However, these scientists are a little inconvenient to Mr. Gore.

Posted by: Broadlighter at February 28, 2007 9:44 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?